Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Motorola Razr (2026) | Specs, Camera & Battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Motorola Razr
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.7-inch Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (with Exynos 2400) that was released on July 9, 2025, against the Motorola Razr (2025), which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7400X and came out 2 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Price & Availability
| Feature | Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | Razr (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Launch price | $899 | $699 |
| Announced | July 2025 | April 2025 |
| Release date | July 2025 | May 2025 |
Key Differences
| Advantage | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Performance (AnTuTu) | 2.5x better (1781K vs 704K) | Offers significantly stronger overall performance for demanding apps and gaming. |
| Battery Life | 7% longer (16:34 vs 15:31 hours) | Provides slightly better endurance for daily use. |
| Display Brightness | 21% higher peak brightness (1433 vs 1182 nits) | Easier to view outdoors in direct sunlight. |
| Operating System | Android 16 vs Android 15 | Ships with a more recent OS, ensuring longer software support. |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 vs UFS 2.2 | Faster read/write speeds improve app loading and file transfers. |
| CPU Cores | Higher (+2 cores) | Handles multitasking and heavy workloads more efficiently. |
| GeekBench 6 (Single-core) | 81% faster (1930 vs 1064) | Delivers much stronger single-core performance for everyday tasks. |
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Display: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Motorola Razr (2026)
| Feature | Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | Razr (2025) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | POLED | Different panel tech, AMOLED usually has richer colors. |
| Size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ | Razr offers a slightly larger screen. |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2640 px | 1080 × 2640 px | Both deliver the same resolution. |
| Aspect ratio | 22:9 | 22:9 | Very tall and slim screens. |
| PPI | 426 | 413 | Slightly sharper on Samsung. |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | Both smooth and responsive. |
| Adaptive refresh | Yes (1–120 Hz) | Yes (1–120 Hz) | Adjusts for efficiency. |
| Max brightness | 1600 nits | 1200 nits | Samsung is brighter in standard mode. |
| HDR peak | 2600 nits | 3000 nits | Motorola shines brighter in HDR. |
| HDR support | HDR10+ | HDR10+ | Both support HDR10+. |
| Touch sampling | – | 300 Hz | Razr is more responsive for gaming. |
| Protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Gorilla Glass Victus | Slightly stronger protection on Samsung. |
| Features | DCI-P3, AOD | DCI-P3, AOD, DC Dimming | Both color-accurate, Razr adds DC Dimming. |
| Screen-to-body | 85.4% | 85% | Almost identical. |
Design & Build: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Motorola Razr (2026)
| Feature | Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | Razr (2025) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.1 mm | 171.3 mm | Razr is taller. |
| Width | 71.9 mm | 73.9 mm | Razr is wider. |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 7.25 mm | Samsung is thinner. |
| Weight | 187 g | 188 g | Almost the same. |
| Waterproof | IP48 | IP48 | Equal splash/dust resistance. |
| Cooling | Vapor chamber | – | Better sustained performance on Samsung. |
| Rear material | Glass | Eco-leather | Razr has a more premium leather feel. |
| Frame | Metal | Metal | Same sturdy build. |
| Colors | White, Black | Gray, Blue, Green | Razr has more variety. |
Performance: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Motorola Razr (2026)
| Feature | Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | Razr (2025) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Exynos 2400 | Dimensity 7400X | Samsung uses its own flagship chip, Motorola uses MediaTek. |
| CPU | 10 cores (Cortex-X4 & A720 mix) | 8 cores (Cortex-A78 & A55) | Samsung has more cores and stronger architecture. |
| GPU | Xclipse 940 (768 units) | Mali-G615 MP2 (256 units) | Samsung has a much stronger GPU. |
| FLOPS | ~3406 GFLOPS | ~666 GFLOPS | Huge graphics power difference. |
| NPU | Yes | MediaTek APU 655 | Both support AI acceleration. |
| Geekbench SC | 1930 | 1064 | +81% faster on Samsung. |
| Geekbench MC | 6276 | 2980 | +111% faster on Samsung. |
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,781,862 | 704,138 | Samsung is ~2.5× faster overall. |
Memory & Storage: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Motorola Razr (2026)
| Feature | Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | Razr (2025) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAM | 8 GB LPDDR5X | 8 GB LPDDR4X | Faster memory type on Samsung. |
| Channels | 4 | 2 | Samsung handles memory more efficiently. |
| Storage | 128 GB UFS 4.0 | 256 GB UFS 2.2 | Motorola has bigger storage, Samsung has much faster storage. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither supports microSD. |
Battery & Charging: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Motorola Razr (2026)
| Feature | Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | Razr (2025) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4000 mAh | 4500 mAh | Motorola has a larger battery. |
| Charging | 25W | 30W | Motorola charges faster. |
| Wireless | 15W | 15W | Equal. |
| Reverse | Yes (wireless) | Yes (wireless) | Both support it. |
| Battery Life | 16:34 hrs | 15:31 hrs | Samsung lasts ~7% longer. |
| Full Charge | 1:29 hrs | 0:55 hrs | Motorola charges much faster. |
Cameras: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Motorola Razr (2026)
| Feature | Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | Razr (2025) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP + 12 MP ultra-wide | 50 MP + 13 MP ultra-wide | Similar setups. |
| Aperture | f/1.8 (main) | f/1.7 (main) | Razr has a slightly brighter lens. |
| Sensor size | 1/1.57″ | 1/1.95″ | Samsung has a larger sensor → better low light. |
| Selfie | 10 MP | 32 MP | Razr has far higher resolution selfies. |
| Video | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps | Samsung records smoother 4K. |
| Features | OIS, Pro, Bokeh | OIS, Pro, Bokeh | Both well-equipped |
Audio: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Motorola Razr (2026)
| Feature | Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | Razr (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5mm Jack | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Connectivity: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Motorola Razr (2026)
| Feature | Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | Razr (2025) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Both support latest Wi-Fi 6E with wide compatibility. |
| Wi-Fi features | Dual Band, MiMO, Direct, Hotspot, Display | Dual Band, MiMO, Direct, Hotspot, Display | Feature set is identical. |
| Bluetooth | v5.4 (LE) | v5.4 (LE) | Same latest Bluetooth version with low-energy mode. |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C | Standard modern connector. |
| USB version | – | 2.0 | Razr specifies USB 2.0; Samsung not detailed. |
| USB features | Charging, OTG, Storage mode | Charging, OTG, Storage mode | Both allow peripheral and storage use. |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No | Samsung supports external display output. |
| GPS systems | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | Full satellite support on both. |
| NFC | Yes | Yes | Equal mobile payment support. |
| Infrared port | No | No | Neither supports IR. |
| SIM | 1× Nano + eSIM | 1× Nano + eSIM | Both support physical + eSIM, no hybrid slot. |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes | Both are 5G-ready. |
FAQs: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Motorola Razr (2026)
Q1. Which phone is more powerful, the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE or the Razr (2025)?
The Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is significantly more powerful, with about 2.5× higher AnTuTu score, faster CPU/GPU, and newer memory/storage standards.
Q2. Which has the better display?
Both offer tall 120 Hz OLED panels, but Samsung is brighter in regular use (1600 nits vs 1200), while the Razr peaks higher in HDR (3000 vs 2600 nits).
Q3. Which one has longer battery life?
Despite having a smaller 4000 mAh battery, the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE lasts about 7% longer overall (16:34 hrs vs 15:31 hrs), thanks to efficiency.
Q4. Which phone charges faster?
The Motorola Razr (2025). It reaches 61% in 30 minutes and fully charges in 55 minutes, while Samsung takes about 1 hour 29 minutes.
Q5. Which has the better camera system?
Both have dual 50 MP setups, but Samsung offers a larger sensor size, 4K at 60 fps video, and stronger low-light performance. The Razr, however, has a much higher-resolution selfie camera (32 MP vs 10 MP).
Q6. Do both support 5G and eSIM?
Yes, both phones are 5G-capable and support a Nano SIM plus eSIM.
Q7. What about durability?
Both are IP48-rated for dust and splash resistance. Samsung uses Gorilla Glass Victus 2 (slightly tougher), while Motorola uses Victus with an eco-leather back for grip.
Q8. Which phone is cheaper?
The Motorola Razr (2025) is more affordable at $699, while the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE starts at $899.
Q9. Do they come with a charger in the box?
No, neither phone includes a bundled charger.
Q10. Who should buy which phone?
- Choose Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE if you want raw performance, longer software support, better brightness in daily use, and camera stability.
- Choose Motorola Razr (2025) if you prefer larger battery, faster charging, higher-resolution selfies, and lower price.
